What is a “behaviorist”, anyway?

“..I spoke with the behaviorist my vet recommended, and then I spoke with a local behaviorist that my neighbor told me about…”, the woman explained as we spoke on the telephone regarding her aggressive dog who had now bitten two people, requiring stitches in both cases. I nearly literally began to grind my teeth in frustration at the sound of that overly and misused term, “behaviorist”. In this case, I knew the people she was referring to as “behaviorists”.

The first individual is a veterinarian who has shown a strong interest in behavior for a few years. She has given talks on puppy issues at a few places, and attended a training class once that I was teaching. I respect her desire to learn – but she is still very much learning at this point. She is not board certified in behavior. The second person is a dog trainer who has been training for perhaps five years, and I’m sure he is a talented individual but I would hesitate to think of him as an expert in a case that is heartbreaking for a family.

As a trainer and someone who has worked with behavior issues for years, I have nothing against these individuals. But I do wonder what can be done about the use of the word “behaviorist” when clients are looking for expert help with their difficult, severe, and often life-threatening (at least for the dog if not for the humans it might encounter) doggy situations.

My understanding is that the term “behaviorist” implies academic credentials of some sort which should be beyond and above, sort of like the difference between a PhD and a B.A. – or an x-ray technician and an M.D. I really don’t think it’s the sort of title that one should give to oneself – or that one should accept when someone tries to give it to you.

Why, you might wonder, do I feel this way? Why do I even care?

Because, and I have thought about this, I have watched the “new world” of dog training evolve – a world where there is now an emphasis on the individual temperament and personality of both the dog and the owner; where there are many types of tools available that didn’t exist earlier (no-pull harnesses, head halters, the use of psychotropic drugs to aid in the treatment of behavior problems); where there are new sports that didn’t exist (fly-ball, agility, rally); where veterinarians are now board-certified in behavior and where there are now professional dog trainers’ organizations. The American Veterinary Medical Association is now stepping in to decide what aspects of training dogs should be considered “veterinary medicine”. Dog owners now have a plethora of possibilities available to them, and along with these changes come new standards for treatment, and new expectations. It isn’t enough anymore that a dog can do his basic obedience commands (although that will always be important) – now an expert must be able to evaluate in a professional manner how *all* of the above tools/possibilities might work to help to solve behavioral issues.

This doesn’t mean that a regular “dog trainer” might not be the one who can best handle any given situation – someone who has intuition, experience and referrals from other clients and veterinarians. But it’s only fair to delineate ourselves by what we actually are: I am proud of my years of experience and know what I can successfully do. I, (and others like me) may have worked with more behavior cases than many of those just coming out of school: but I am *not* a behaviorist. I am a dog trainer who works with behavior issues, and I have my place in the scheme of things. When we consider all of the “new” legal liability, professional expectations and what clients are now looking for it is correct for all of us to be clearly defined.

As I spoke to the client regarding her aggression issues with her dog, I refrained from giving a lecture regarding the expertise and definitions of titles in the dog-training world. She felt she had discussed her issues with two experts, since they were “behaviorists”. As it stands now, the dog – in line with their recommendations and in spite of the fact that neither person actually saw the dog – will likely be euthanized in the next few days.

Thank you, Valerie!

Thank you for voicing one of my own pet peeves. I feel your pain. We have a "behaviorist" in our area who uses an e-collar to teach dogs not to jump on people. This person is no more a "behaviorist" than I am an astronaut. With so many titles a trainer who specializes in behavior cases could use -- "behavior specialist" or "behavior consultant" for starters -- I do not see the need to call oneself a behaviorist if one has not earned the credential. I am not happy about the AVMA's plan to regulate dog trainers in any way, but I do wish there were *some* regulation within the industry. The CPDT is a good start for creating a standard, and I look forward to the expansion of the credential to include hands-on competence.

"behaviorist"

I completely agree. I have been a dog trainer that helps with behavior issues for the past 20 years. I am looking forward to the day when I can use the term behaviorist when referring to myself. I have been going to community college for the past few years and let me tell you after a 30 year break it is challenging, trigonometry is hard, yet exciting. I am looking forward to attending the University of Washington in the fall and before it is all over have the required credentials to be called a behaviorist. Until that day arrives however I am a dog trainer who helps with behavior.

What's in a name

This is one of my personal pet peeves as well. I've found that most people in my area who openly market and refer to themselves as behaviorists do not hold any specific academic credentials to warrant usage of that term. However they do so simply because they can and it implies that they are more than just a dog trainer to an unsuspecting public. I'm against any independent organization such as the AVMA attempting to regulate our industry, but I am all for educating the public. I have a "How to Choose a Good Dog Trainer" page on my website where I outline the different terms and give consumers and prospective clients tips on how to find the dog training and behavior modification professional who will best suit their needs. I've had many people thank me for the information.

behaviorist

We have the same issue in our state. "Behaviorist", to mangle Shakespeare, is a word full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Anyone can call themselves a behaviorist with absolutely zero qualifications. Like others who have been training for years (decades!), I am proud of what I do, but I am NOT a behaviorist. I specialize in "difficult dog" issues, but when I come across a truly dangerous or psychotic dog (rare, but I am convinced mental illness happens in dogs too), I refer to Dr Hetts up on Colorado as our nearest real behaviorist. Those who advertise in our yellow pages have no qualifications!
I'm on the fence re: AVMA or another organization regulating, but it sure would be better than the dangerously incompetent with good marketing skills!

Katherine Bryce, CPDT, CMG
The Family Dog
Santa Fe NM USA

Dog Star Daily® Recomended Products:

  • The Evolution of Canine Social Behavior cover image
    The Evolution of Canine Social Behavior
     
  • Canine Adventures: Fun Things to Do With Your Dog cover image
    Canine Adventures
     
  • Feeling Outnumbered? How to Manage and Enjoy Your Multi-Dog Household. cover image
    Feeling Outnumbered? How to Manage and Enjoy Your Multi-Dog Household
     
  • The Dog Who Loved Too Much: Tales, Treatments and the Psychology of Dogs cover image
    The Dog Who Loved Too Much: Tales, Treatments and the Psychology of Dogs